09-12-2013, 02:14 PM
User Info
 09-12-2013, 02:22 PM
User Info
Interesting, Emanuel. Why does it feel like P&G must be behind this? Wink

One of the purported advantages is that it doesn't clog easily...I guess I can see that but don't really have that problem in my use.

As much as I am glad to see innovation in this realm, I have my doubts if this will really take off.

49 1,269
 09-12-2013, 02:26 PM
User Info
Me too! I don't feel very enthusiastic about it... maybe because of the somewhat "odd" design.
And the concept itself doesn't look very appealing to me...

2 5,599
 09-12-2013, 02:54 PM
  • Agravic
  • Emeritus
  • Pennsylvania, USA
User Info
My first thought is marginal improvement in efficiency at the cost of marked increase in skin irritation ... Confused

119 19,681
 09-12-2013, 04:38 PM
User Info
Hmmmmm...,,interesting, but offers no advantages. Also can you imagine trying to get that under your nose?

28 300
 09-12-2013, 04:43 PM
User Info
I'm holding out for the $300 stainless version.

WOW, that head is monstrous Confused

8 2,718
 09-12-2013, 05:02 PM
User Info
Holy cow! Where did you find this, Emanuel?!Biggrin

93 21,373
 09-12-2013, 06:19 PM
User Info
That is an interesting design, but the thick head might be harder to maneuver. To me, part of the wet shaving process is to do a single pass WTG, XTG, and ATG, so I don't see the value in two blades follow the same path. I think two blades might cause more irritation, and maybe even a higher likelihood of getting cut (skin is not flat - the two blades would contact the skin at different places), etc..

0 90
 09-12-2013, 07:30 PM
  • Triad
  • Senior Member
  • Texas
User Info
Looks painfull to me id try it for $20 but not $60+

119 1,746
 09-12-2013, 08:51 PM
User Info
kind of defeats the purpose.

4 309
 09-12-2013, 11:34 PM
User Info
The first thing that struck me is: WHY?

- You'll loose the ability to adjust the angle on the fly - too steep and just the upper blade touches your skin, too shallow and just the lower blade is in contact.
- The blade angle looks pretty extreme to me - compared to my collection you would have to hold the handle almost parallel to the skin.
- The second blade would hit no lather - shavebumps a-hoy!

So again, why? YMMV and all that, but I just fail to see what advantage this would give?

3 7,844
 09-12-2013, 11:56 PM
User Info

0 338
 09-13-2013, 03:11 AM
  • taco8slo
  • Shavenookian Newbie
  • California
User Info
The handle looks nice, that is all.

15 130
 09-13-2013, 04:42 AM
User Info
I'd give something like this a shot, but I agree with Bruce; that head is unwieldy.

I like how its called the "Razolution" as if adding a twin-blade razor is a brand new thing. Pretty soon we'll have vintage Mach3s!

88 1,538
 09-13-2013, 05:17 AM
User Info
I've seen similar razors before, they pop up every now and again. No one ever seems to think much of them once they try them. The consensus seems to be that they work OK, but are really more of a novelty than anything else.

My tapatalk-fu is strong.

6 327
 09-13-2013, 05:57 AM
  • dcc
  • Polsilver Vendor
  • EU
User Info
2 blades,no-no-no Angry

32 438
 09-13-2013, 05:58 AM
User Info
So...who's going to take one for the team and report back?

1 77
 09-13-2013, 10:20 AM
  • Shanman
  • Reserve Collection Squirrel Hair
  • NE Florida
User Info
There is a reason I came this far to end up with a single blade, and that design is not prompting me to go back. Ever.

146 1,996
 09-13-2013, 11:09 AM
  • Harvey
  • Senior Member
  • North Hills CA
User Info
I actually have a pac of SCHICK DE 2002 which was also called Schick Twin...they are 2 DE blades fused together giving 2 cutting edges ....actually never tried them yet....had them for years...

6 2,205
 09-13-2013, 02:14 PM
User Info
I aggree with all of you and i would like to add one more potential issue which is the gap between blades looks too great which will leas to more cuts.


10 95
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)