05-19-2017, 07:25 AM
#1
User Info
Some time ago I switched completely to face lathering, but I have recently noticed that my Kent BK2 isn't great for face lathering, mostly I suppose because it doesn't have a lot of back bone. From time to time I now bowl lather with the Kent. Anybody else bowl lather with that sort of brush and otherwise face lather?

0 55
Reply
 05-19-2017, 08:02 AM
#2
User Info
Much the same here - I mostly face lather but when I occasionally whip up a bowl of lather, I reach for a more "luxurious" brush, which usually means super soft and "backbone challenged".

67 3,534
Reply
 05-19-2017, 11:31 AM
#3
User Info
A floppy brush is the result of less density and a higher loft.  That means less backbone but greater flow, and it's that greater flow which makes it better for bowl lathering.  A floppy brush is also softer, and can give a more luxurious feeling that many like.   I face lather exclusively now.  When I used to bowl lather years ago, I enjoyed floppy brushes, such as the Vulfix 2236.

41 4,637
Reply
 05-20-2017, 08:29 PM
#4
User Info
I have also bowl lathered with boat brushes in the past , some really great ones for this include semogue SOC , 2000 , and omega pro.

57 1,313
Reply
 05-25-2017, 02:35 PM
#5
  • doc47
  • Active Member
  • Northern Arizona
User Info
I have a couple of floppy brushes that are great for face lathering as well as bowl lathering. But generally I would have to agree Ricardo.

4 407
Reply
 05-25-2017, 03:37 PM
#6
User Info
I kind of bowl lather and face lather, i have a SWK scuttle that I use and it's the only bowl i use so I kinda work up a semi bowl lather then finish on my face and in my brush collection I have several soft non back boned brushes and they seem to do a better job, my softest if my WW Black Wolf Synthetic and its soooo soft but does and excellent job not matter bowl or face lathering.

6 1,129
Reply
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)