07-04-2019, 03:01 AM
#1
User Info
Ever watched someone shave under their arms, or shaved your own armpits? Did it ever strike you that using a straight blade isn't the best suited for shaving a concave surface? You're not the first... back in 1931 Joseph J Schermack filed a patent where he pointed out that an


Quote:...ordinary safety razor has a straight cutting edge and therefore is not adapted for shaving a concave contour, as it would be apt to cut or scratch the flesh.

The guy had a point, even if his invention seems to have failed in the marketplace - although it failed, I believe, due to other reasons than being misconceived.
[Image: US1958718-0.png]
Judging by the drawing in the patent, the underarm razor is a fairly straightforward three piece razor but with a circular head. Mr Schermack seems to have been stuck to the idea of making his razor a double edged razor, despite suggesting a circular blade that was edged all around. Or in his own words:

Quote:Figure 2 is a plan view of the circular crenellated guard, with upstanding diametrically opposed segmental portions overlapping the cutting edge of the blade on opposite sides of the latter.

To me this would be wasting part of the cutting edge, as well as meaning the shaver would have to pay close attention to how the razor twisted while shaving. Compare Mr Schermack's invention to the Curvefit or the Shermac razors (both of which was manufactured and sold), and you'll see two ways to avoid that problem.
I suspect that the main reason Mr Schermack's invention seems to have failed is the cost of manufacturing the blades (inherently more costly than straight edged blades).

3 6,666
Reply
 07-04-2019, 09:20 AM
#2
  • bullgoose
  • The Enabler
  • Redondo Beach, California, U.S.A
User Info
(07-04-2019, 03:01 AM)WegianWarrior Wrote: I suspect that the main reason Mr Schermack's invention seems to have failed is the cost of manufacturing the blades (inherently more costly than straight edged blades).
You are probably right about the blades. Even if he could have manufactured the blades, proprietary blades really limit the potential market.

52 21,047
Reply
 07-04-2019, 12:14 PM
#3
User Info
It might be that I'm not looking hard enough, but I find few patents for razors with proprietary blades dated after the patent rights for Gillette's blades expired... I suspect a connection Wink

3 6,666
Reply
 07-04-2019, 04:17 PM
#4
  • bullgoose
  • The Enabler
  • Redondo Beach, California, U.S.A
User Info
(07-04-2019, 12:14 PM)WegianWarrior Wrote: It might be that I'm not looking hard enough, but I find few patents for razors with proprietary blades dated after the patent rights for Gillette's blades expired... I suspect a connection Wink

Biggrin

52 21,047
Reply
 07-05-2019, 09:49 AM
#5
  • Puma
  • Senior Member
  • Central Jersey
User Info
I would think that a circular blade would cut the user. The leading part of the circle would be fine, but the edges at the sides, if that makes sense, would be slicing into the users skin like two scalpels. So his double edge design makes sense to me.

16 924
Reply
 07-05-2019, 01:54 PM
#6
  • Puma
  • Senior Member
  • Central Jersey
User Info
I do agree that the Curvefit looks like a better design.

16 924
Reply
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)